Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Br J Haematol ; 196(2): 351-355, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1373796

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic has created many challenges in the management of immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). The recommendation for avoidance of steroids by WHO led to the off-licence use, supported by NHS England, of thrombopoietin mimetics (TPO-RA) for newly diagnosed or relapsed ITP. This is a real-world prospective study which investigated the treatment patterns and outcomes in this setting. Twenty-four hospitals across the UK submitted 343 cases. Corticosteroids remain the mainstay of ITP treatment, but TPO-RAs were more effective. Incidental COVID-19 infection was identified in a significant number of patients (9·5%), while 14 cases were thought to be secondary to COVID-19 vaccination.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Pandemics , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/therapy , Adolescent , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Autoimmune Diseases/complications , COVID-19/blood , COVID-19 Vaccines/adverse effects , Combined Modality Therapy , Comorbidity , Connective Tissue Diseases/complications , Contraindications, Drug , Disease Management , Female , Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hospitals, District/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Immunoglobulins, Intravenous/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasms/complications , Off-Label Use , Platelet Transfusion , Prospective Studies , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/drug therapy , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/epidemiology , Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic/etiology , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Thromboembolism/epidemiology , Thromboembolism/etiology , Thrombopoietin/agonists , Tranexamic Acid/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 103(6): 404-411, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1218301

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: We aim to identify any changes in outcome for patients undergoing nonelective surgery at the start of the UK pandemic in our district general hospital. This was a single-centre retrospective cohort review of a UK district general hospital serving a population of over 250,000 people. METHODS: Participants were all patients undergoing a surgical procedure in the acute theatre list between 23 March to 11 May in both 2019 and 2020. Primary outcome was 90-day postoperative mortality. Secondary outcomes include time to surgical intervention and length of inpatient stay. RESULTS: A total of 132 patients (2020) versus 141 (2019) patients were included. Although overall 90-day postoperative mortality was higher in 2020 (9.8%) compared with 2019 (5.7%), this difference was not statistically significant (p=0.196). In 2020, eight patients tested positive for COVID-19 either as an inpatient or within 2 weeks of discharge, of whom five patients died. Time to surgical intervention was significantly faster for NCEPOD (National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death) code 3 patients in 2020 than in 2019 (p=0.027). There were no significant differences in mean length of inpatient stay. CONCLUSIONS: We found that patients were appropriately prioritised using NCEPOD classification, with no statistically significant differences in 90-day postoperative mortality and length of inpatient stay compared with the 2019 period. A study on a larger scale would further elucidate the profile and outcomes of patients requiring acute surgery to generate statistical significance.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Communicable Disease Control , Emergency Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, District/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, General/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Surgical Procedures, Operative/mortality , Young Adult
3.
Ann R Coll Surg Engl ; 103(6): 395-403, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1218299

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality rates during the COVID-19 pandemic have been higher than expected, leading to mass cancellation of elective operating in the UK. To minimise this, the Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital NHS Foundation Trust elective surgery hub and the executive team at London Bridge Hospital (LBH) created an elective operating framework at LBH, a COVID-19 minimal site, in which patients self-isolated for two weeks and proceeded with surgery only following a negative preoperative SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction swab. The aim was to determine the rates of rates of postoperative COVID-19 infection. METHODS: The collaboration involved three large hospital trusts, covering the geographic area of south-east London. All patients were referred to LBH for elective surgery. Patients were followed up by telephone interview at four weeks postoperatively. RESULTS: Three hundred and ninety-eight patients from 13 surgical specialties were included in the analysis. The median age was 60 (IQR 29-71) years. Sixty-three per cent (252/398) were female. In total, 78.4% of patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists grade of 1-2 and the average BMI was 27.2 (IQR 23.7-31.8) kg/m2. Some 83.6% (336/402) were 'major' operations. The rate of COVID-19-related death in our cohort was 0.25% (1/398). Overall, there was a 1.26% (5/398) 30-day postoperative all-cause mortality rate. Seven patients (1.76%) reported COVID-19 symptoms, but none attended the emergency department or were readmitted to hospital as a result. CONCLUSION: The risk of contracting COVID-19 in our elective operating framework was very low. We demonstrate that high-volume major surgery is safe, even at the peak of the pandemic, if patients are screened appropriately preoperatively.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hospitals, District/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Surgical Procedures, Operative/methods , Adult , Aged , COVID-19/prevention & control , Critical Pathways , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Surgical Procedures, Operative/adverse effects , Surgical Procedures, Operative/mortality , Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data , United Kingdom/epidemiology
4.
BMJ Open ; 11(1): e047016, 2021 01 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1050403

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the characteristics, clinical management and outcomes of patients with COVID-19 at district hospitals. DESIGN: A descriptive observational cross-sectional study. SETTING: District hospitals (4 in metro and 4 in rural health services) in the Western Cape, South Africa. District hospitals were small (<150 beds) and led by family physicians. PARTICIPANTS: All patients who presented to the hospitals' emergency centre and who tested positive for COVID-19 between March and June 2020. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Source of referral, presenting symptoms, demographics, comorbidities, clinical assessment and management, laboratory turnaround time, clinical outcomes, factors related to mortality, length of stay and location. RESULTS: 1376 patients (73.9% metro, 26.1% rural). Mean age 46.3 years (SD 16.3), 58.5% females. The majority were self-referred (71%) and had comorbidities (67%): hypertension (41%), type 2 diabetes (25%), HIV (14%) and overweight/obesity (19%). Assessment of COVID-19 was mild (49%), moderate (18%) and severe (24%). Test turnaround time (median 3.0 days (IQR 2.0-5.0 days)) was longer than length of stay (median 2.0 day (IQR 2.0-3.0)). The most common treatment was oxygen (41%) and only 0.8% were intubated and ventilated. Overall mortality was 11%. Most were discharged home (60%) and only 9% transferred to higher levels of care. Increasing age (OR 1.06 (95% CI 1.04 to 1.07)), male (OR 2.02 (95% CI 1.37 to 2.98)), overweight/obesity (OR 1.58 (95% CI 1.02 to 2.46)), type 2 diabetes (OR 1.84 (95% CI 1.24 to 2.73)), HIV (OR 3.41 (95% CI 2.06 to 5.65)), chronic kidney disease (OR 5.16 (95% CI 2.82 to 9.43)) were significantly linked with mortality (p<0.05). Pulmonary diseases (tuberculosis (TB), asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, post-TB structural lung disease) were not associated with increased mortality. CONCLUSION: District hospitals supported primary care and shielded tertiary hospitals. Patients had high levels of comorbidities and similar clinical pictures to that reported elsewhere. Most patients were treated as people under investigation. Mortality was comparable to similar settings and risk factors identified.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Hospitals, District/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Adult , Cause of Death , Comorbidity , Cross-Sectional Studies , Disease Management , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Patient Discharge , Referral and Consultation , Respiration, Artificial , South Africa/epidemiology , Symptom Assessment , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL